Duke Energy

Current Campaigns

Customer & Environmental Benefits Secured

The IURC denied Duke Energy's request for a $1.87B rate increase!

Since 2006, Duke has been planning and building one of the most expensive coal plants in US history, and they want us to pay for it.

Related Documents

August 25, 2016

Average Duke Energy Bill PDF

January 20, 2016

Duke IGCC Settlement Fact Sheet

In the Media

January 10, 2013

Despite claims of a cost "cap" for ratepayers, the settlement saddles ratepayers with billions in costs.

December 18, 2012

Today, a coalition of citizen groups filed an objection to the renewed participation of Chief Administrative Law Judge Lorraine Seyfried in proceedings relating to Duke Energy’s problem-plagued and scandal-ridden Edwardsport IGCC power plant.

November 29, 2012

Public opinion poll and companion report released by Sierra Club and Citizens Action Coalition chronicle history of corruption and cost overruns at Edwardsport. Unsurprisingly, the public is unsympathetic toward Duke Energy.

July 2, 2012

Experts: $2.595B “hard-cap” actually “firm floor”, IGCC plant will cost ratepayers at least $3.25B

June 22, 2012

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) continues to do a grave disservice to the captive ratepayers of Duke Energy Indiana. After denying a motion by the coalition of consumer and environmental groups to stay the current proceeding regarding the scandal-ridden and problem-plagued Edwardsport IGCC powerplant until after testimony and evidence was filed in the settlement portion of the proceeding, the IURC gave the groups just 72 hours to file testimony in the case.

Pages