Duke Energy

Current Campaigns

Customer & Environmental Benefits Secured

The IURC denied Duke Energy's request for a $1.87B rate increase!

Since 2006, Duke has been planning and building one of the most expensive coal plants in US history, and they want us to pay for it.

Related Documents

August 25, 2016

Average Duke Energy Bill PDF

January 20, 2016

Duke IGCC Settlement Fact Sheet

In the Media

May 22, 2012

A close inspection of the proposed settlement between Duke Energy and the Office of Utility Consumer Counselor regarding the Edwardsport Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Station Project is anything but a victory for Duke's ratepayers.

April 25, 2012

The settlement filed yesterday at the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission between Duke Energy, the Indiana Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC), Nucor Steel, and the Duke Energy Indiana Industrial Group falls well short of what the captive ratepayers of Duke Energy deserve.

April 25, 2012

The now $3 billion Edwardsport Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) coal-fired power plant currently under construction by Duke Energy has been shrouded in controversy since Duke Energy first filed for approval before the IURC in 2006. The burgeoning ethics scandal has made the approval of this problem plagued power plant even more questionable.

December 12, 2011

CAC remains firm in our belief that the failure to disclose the communications between Duke Energy executives and the former Chairman of the IURC at a very minimum were improper and represented a serious violation of the public trust.

August 22, 2011

Today, in a letter to Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Chairman James Atterholt, the Citizens Action Coalition raised concerns with respect to the Commission’s apparent lack of engagement to date, at least publicly, in the proposed merger between Duke Energy and Progress Energy.

Pages